Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd T/A Saputo Dairy

Case [2023] FWC 3304


[2023] FWC 3304

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd T/A Saputo Dairy

(B2023/1356)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 12 DECEMBER 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd T/A Saputo Dairy (Saputo Dairy or Employer)

  1. On 11 December 2023, the Commission was advised, in effect, that Saputo Dairy did not object to the Application.

  1. I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) have made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.[1]

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Michael Anderson on behalf of the CEPU, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Saputo Dairy, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. Following consultation with the parties, one of the ballot questions was removed from the proposed order.[2]

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 29 January 2024.[3] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR769253.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter (B2023/1351). To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, the Commission will also issue the Order requiring their attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2023/1351.

[2] The question involved the wearing of union clothing and related matters, and the proposed rewording of the question did not address the concerns raised by the Commission. The CEPU advised that it would in these circumstances, abandon the question.

[3] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order, which is the period required by the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct a ballot.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR769252>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd T/A Saputo Dairy [2023] FWC 3304
Case
[2023] FWC 3304
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission was asked to decide on an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd. The CEPU sought to conduct a ballot to authorize protected action, which typically refers to industrial action such as strikes or lockouts, due to ongoing bargaining disputes. Saputo Dairy did not object to the application, and the Commission proceeded to decide the matter without a hearing, taking into account the submissions and evidence provided by the CEPU. The CEPU had declared that it had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the employer and had fulfilled the necessary requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the CEPU had met the statutory criteria for ordering a protected action ballot. This involved confirming that the CEPU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Saputo Dairy and that all procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act had been satisfied. Additionally, the Commission had to determine an appropriate closing date for the ballot, which needed to accommodate the Australian Electoral Commission's requirements for conducting the ballot. After considering the material provided and consulting with the parties involved, the Commission was satisfied that the CEPU had met all the necessary criteria and that the ballot should proceed.

The Deputy President of the Commission determined that the CEPU had indeed fulfilled the requirements for a protected action ballot, including demonstrating genuine attempts at bargaining and meeting the notification time as specified by the Fair Work Act. The Commission also decided to remove one of the ballot questions due to concerns raised during the consultation process. The Deputy President set the closing date for the ballot as 29 January 2024, allowing sufficient time for the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct the voting process. Furthermore, the Commission scheduled a compulsory conciliation conference to be conducted by another Member of the Commission, which would involve the CEPU, Saputo Dairy, and potentially other bargaining representatives. The Commission aimed to ensure that the parties were prepared for meaningful negotiations at the conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.