Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Rio Tinto Aluminium Limited T/A Rio Tinto Alcan Gove

Case [2022] FWC 2986


[2022] FWC 2986

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.459—Protected action

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Rio Tinto Aluminium Limited T/A Rio Tinto Alcan Gove

(B2022/1690)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

SYDNEY, 10 NOVEMBER 2022

Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2022/1443

  1. On 9 November 2022, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) pursuant to s. 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) to extend the 30 day period for protected action authorised by a protected action ballot order, PR746264 made on 28 September 2022. The Order applies to certain employees of Rio Tinto Aluminium Limited T/A Rio Tinto Alcan Gove (the Respondent).

  1. The ballot result, by which a majority of the relevant employees endorsed the proposed forms of protected industrial action, was declared on 14 October 2022. Pursuant to s.459(1)(d)(i) of the Act, the 30 day period for protected action commenced on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot and therefore expires at midnight on 12‎ ‎November‎ ‎2022.

  1. On 10 November 2022, the Respondent advised the Commission via email that it does not oppose the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia’s application to extend the 30 day period for protected industrial action. Accordingly, I have determined the matter on the basis of the documentation filed.

  1. In addressing s.459(3) of the Act, this application is made by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia who is the Applicant for which the protected action ballot order was issued. Furthermore, the period specified in s.459(1)(d)(i) has not been previously extended.

  1. On that basis and on the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the relevant requirements of s.459 of the Act have been met and that a 30 day extension is appropriate. As the 30 day period expires at midnight on 12‎ ‎November‎ ‎2022, the extension period will operate from 12‎ ‎November‎ ‎2022.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR747813.


VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR747814>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Rio Tinto Aluminium Limited T/A Rio Tinto Alcan Gove [2022] FWC 2986
Case
[2022] FWC 2986
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, sought to extend the 30-day period for protected action authorised by a protected action ballot order made on 28 September 2022. The order applied to certain employees of Rio Tinto Aluminium Limited T/A Rio Tinto Alcan Gove. The ballot result, which endorsed the proposed forms of protected industrial action, was declared on 14 October 2022. The 30-day period for protected action expired at midnight on 12 November 2022. The respondent did not oppose the applicant's application to extend the 30-day period for protected industrial action.

The legal issues before the court were whether the applicant had met the requirements of section 459 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and whether a 30-day extension was appropriate. The court noted that the applicant had met all the relevant requirements of the Act and that the 30-day period had not been previously extended. The court was satisfied that a 30-day extension was appropriate and that the extension period would operate from 12 November 2022.

In light of the above, the court granted the applicant's application to extend the 30-day period for protected industrial action. An order has been separately issued in PR747813. This decision provides clarity on the process for extending the 30-day period for protected industrial action and the requirements that must be met to do so. It also highlights the importance of meeting the relevant requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) when seeking to extend the 30-day period for protected industrial action.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.