Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited

Case [2025] FWC 1491


[2025] FWC 1491

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Qantas Airways Limited

(B2025/865)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 30 MAY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Qantas Airways Limited

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Qantas Airways Limited (Qantas or Employer).

  1. I note that the Australian Workers' Union (AWU)[1] and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[2] have made separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 30 May 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not, in effect, object to the Application if amended to reflect a consent position clarifying the proposed order reached following discussions between the parties.

  1. In the circumstances, I have granted leave to amend the application to reflect the agreed position on the proposed order and determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Matthew Murphy, Union Official, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Qantas, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 16 June 2025.[3] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR787803.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/866.

[2] B2025/867.

[3] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR787805>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited [2025] FWC 1491
Case
[2025] FWC 1491
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Qantas Airways Limited. The Australian Workers' Union and the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union also made separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement. The application was made in light of the parties reaching a consent position following discussions, and the Employer did not object to the Application if amended to reflect this position.

The legal issues before the Deputy President involved determining whether the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met, specifically if there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and if all steps necessary for the conduct of the ballot had been taken. Additionally, the court needed to confirm the appointment of Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd as an authorised ballot agent under section 468A of the Act. The court was also required to determine the closing date for voting in the ballot, establishing the ballot period for the purposes of section 448A(2) of the Act.

The Deputy President concluded that the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met based on the material before the court, including the declaration by a CEPU Union Official that the union had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with Qantas. The Deputy President also confirmed Vero as an authorised ballot agent and set the closing date for voting in the ballot as 16 June 2025, which was 10 working days from the making of the Order. An Order was separately issued in PR787803. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters, with Directions likely to be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

This decision grants leave to amend the application to reflect the agreed position on the proposed order and determines the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. It also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act and confirms the appointment of Vero as an authorised ballot agent. The closing date for voting in the ballot is set as 10 working days from the making of the Order.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.