| [2025] FWC 26 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd
(B2025/2)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 6 JANUARY 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd (NRG or Employer).
I note that the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU), the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), the Australian Municipal, Clerical, Administrative and Clerical Union (ASU) and the Mining and Energy Union (MEU)[1] have each made separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 3 January 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended following discussions between the parties.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Shawn Higgins, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with NRG, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 20 January 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended minimum period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking certain industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of five (5) working days applies to certain items listed within Clause fifteen (15) of the Order.
An Order has been separately issued in PR782989.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Respectively, B2025/1, B2025/3, B2025/4 and B2025/5.
[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR782990>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v NRG Gladstone Operating Services Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 26
- Case
- [2025] FWC 26
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining whether the CEPU had met the requirements under section 443 of the Act to allow for the protected action ballot. This included establishing if there was a notification period for the proposed agreement and if the CEPU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with NRG. The court also needed to decide on the appropriate closing date for the ballot, as well as whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extended notice period for certain industrial actions.
The Deputy President, Hampton, concluded that the CEPU had met all the statutory requirements for a ballot order, including demonstrating that it had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with NRG. The court was satisfied that the notification period had been met and that the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were fulfilled. Furthermore, the Deputy President determined that there were exceptional circumstances that justified an extended minimum notice period for certain industrial actions as outlined in section 414(2)(b) of the Act. The closing date for the ballot was set at 20 January 2025. An Order was issued separately to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference involving all bargaining representatives.
The Commission's final orders included granting the CEPU's application for a protected action ballot order and setting the closing date for the ballot. The extended notice period of five working days was also applied to specific items listed within Clause fifteen of the Order. The matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.