Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Northern Seq Distributor Retailer Authority T/A Unitywater

Case [2024] FWC 2199


[2024] FWC 2199

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Northern Seq Distributor – Retailer Authority T/A Unitywater

(B2024/1041)

COMMISSIONER DURHAM

BRISBANE, 19 AUGUST 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Northern SEQ Distributor – Retailer Authority

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU/ETU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Northern SEQ Distributor – Retailed Authority trading as UnityWater (UnityWater or Employer).

  1. I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 16 August 2024, the Commission was initially advised that the Employer objected to the Application. However, the Employer subsequently withdrew their objection on the basis of an undertaking provided by the Applicant.

  1. I observe that the Parties agreed for the Applicant to include the following undertaking when providing written notice of any protected industrial action authorised by the ballot:

The ETU undertakes to ensure that in an emergency situation where there is a risk to personal health and safety and where no other workers are available, ETU members will be available to perform work. ETU members will not engage in industrial action that would endanger the life, personal safety, health or welfare of the population or part thereof.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Daniel Bessell, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with it, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 30 August 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR778423.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

COMMISSIONER


[1] B2024/1044.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR778422>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Northern Seq Distributor Retailer Authority T/A Unitywater [2024] FWC 2199
Case
[2024] FWC 2199
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission dealt with an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU/ETU) for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Northern SEQ Distributor – Retailer Authority trading as UnityWater. The AMWU had also filed a separate application for a protected action ballot order regarding the same enterprise agreement. Initially, the Employer objected to the CEPU/ETU's application but later withdrew the objection upon receiving an undertaking from the union. This undertaking ensured that ETU members would be available in emergencies posing risks to personal health and safety, and that industrial action would not endanger the population's life, personal safety, health, or welfare. The Commission decided to determine the matter on the submitted documents without a hearing. The Commission concluded that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 were met, including the notification time for the proposed agreement, and that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer.

The primary legal issues addressed by the Commission were whether the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the employer and whether all statutory requirements for the ballot were fulfilled. The Commission considered the declaration of Daniel Bessell, the Organiser for the union, who detailed the bargaining steps taken with the employer and confirmed that the union had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement. Additionally, the Commission verified that Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS) was an approved ballot agent under section 468A of the Act. The Commission also set the closing date for the ballot, ensuring that it adhered to the statutory requirement of a 10 working day period from the issuance of the order.

After reviewing the application and the union's undertaking, the Commission granted the union's request for a protected action ballot order. The decision included setting the ballot closing date as 30 August 2024, effectively establishing the ballot period under section 448A(2) of the Act. The Commission also noted that another member would oversee the compulsory conciliation conference related to the enterprise agreement and that all bargaining representatives would be required to attend this conference. Directions would likely be issued to ensure meaningful negotiations.

The Fair Work Commission ordered that a protected action ballot be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd for the union's members, with voting to close on 30 August 2024. This decision facilitates the union's ability to organise a ballot to determine the employees' views on the proposed enterprise agreement, subject to the undertaking provided by the union regarding emergency situations. The Commission also directed that all bargaining representatives attend a compulsory conciliation conference, ensuring continued negotiation efforts to reach an agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.