Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v KONE Elevators Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 1910


[2025] FWC 1910

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

KONE Elevators Pty Ltd

(B2025/1078)

COMMISSIONER CRAWFORD

SYDNEY, 3 JULY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of KONE Elevators Pty Ltd

  1. On 2 July 2025, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made an application under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of KONE Elevators Pty Ltd (KONE).

  1. Later in the day on 2 July 2025, the Commission was advised that KONE objected to the application on public health and safety grounds.

  1. Given KONE’s opposition, I listed a hearing via video on 3 July 2025.

  1. The parties had engaged in further negotiations ahead of the hearing on 3 July 2025, those negotiations then continued during a private conference while the hearing was adjourned.

  1. The CEPU ultimately agreed to provide commitments to KONE on the record during the hearing. Based on the commitments provided by the CEPU, KONE withdrew its opposition to the application. 

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jake Sutton (Organiser) setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with KONE and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with KONE, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the FW Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the FW Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the FW Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 17 July 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the FW Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR788883.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

COMMISSIONER

Appearances:

Mr A Aghazarian for the CEPU.
Mr P Smith for KONE.

Hearing details:

2025. 
Sydney (via video using Microsoft Teams).
3 July.


[1] This is 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR788882>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v KONE Elevators Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1910
Case
[2025] FWC 1910
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) sought a protected action ballot order under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) concerning certain employees of KONE Elevators Pty Ltd (KONE). KONE opposed the application on public health and safety grounds. The Fair Work Commission held a hearing via video on 3 July 2025, where negotiations between the parties continued. The CEPU provided commitments to KONE during the hearing, leading KONE to withdraw its opposition. The Commission was satisfied that the requirements of s.443(1) of the FW Act were met, and Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd was approved to conduct the ballot. The voting was to close on 17 July 2025.

The legal issue before the Commission was whether the CEPU met the criteria for a protected action ballot under s.437 of the FW Act. The Commission had to determine if the CEPU had genuinely tried to reach agreement with KONE and if all requirements for the ballot were met. The Commission also needed to consider KONE's objection based on public health and safety, and if the CEPU's commitments adequately addressed these concerns. Ultimately, the Commission had to decide if the ballot could proceed under the FW Act, considering the statutory requirements and the parties' commitments.

The Commission concluded that the CEPU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with KONE, as evidenced by the declaration of Jake Sutton (Organiser) and the steps taken during bargaining. The Commission accepted the commitments provided by the CEPU as sufficient to address KONE's public health and safety concerns. Consequently, the Commission determined that the requirements for a protected action ballot under s.443(1) of the FW Act were met. The Commission also set the closing date for voting as 17 July 2025, which was 10 working days from the making of the order. The Commission further directed that the matter would be assigned to another Member for a compulsory conciliation conference under s.448A of the FW Act.

In conclusion, the Fair Work Commission granted the CEPU's application for a protected action ballot order. The Commission determined that the CEPU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with KONE and that all statutory requirements for the ballot were met. The Commission set the closing date for voting as 17 July 2025 and directed that a compulsory conciliation conference would be held under s.448A of the FW Act. The Commission also issued an order in PR788883, and the matter was assigned to another Member for further proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.