Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Hydro-Electric Corporation T/A Hydro Tasmania

Case [2022] FWC 1894


[2022] FWC 1894

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Hydro-Electric Corporation T/A Hydro Tasmania

(B2022/699)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 20 JULY 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Hydro-Electric Corporation T/A Hydro Tasmania.

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Hydro-Electric Corporation T/A Hydro Tasmania (the Respondent).

  1. On 19 July 2022, my Associate was advised that the Respondent raised concerns regarding the proposed questions in the draft order. I determined a Mention should be conducted, during which I discussed this matter with the parties and others subsequently raised.

  1. With the Mention having resolved the various matters raised by the parties, I have proceeded to determine the matter on the papers, it not being necessary to conduct a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Christopher John Clark of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR743950.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR743949>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Hydro-Electric Corporation T/A Hydro Tasmania [2022] FWC 1894
Case
[2022] FWC 1894
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission received an application from the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, seeking a protected action ballot order for certain employees of Hydro-Electric Corporation T/A Hydro Tasmania. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred on the proposed questions included in the ballot order for the employees. The Respondent raised concerns regarding these questions, prompting a Mention to discuss the matter with the parties involved.

The primary legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the notification time for the proposed agreement was appropriate and if the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act had been satisfied. The court had to consider the steps taken by the Applicant in bargaining with the Respondent and whether the Applicant had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the Respondent. The court also had to determine if the proposed questions in the ballot order were appropriate and if the requirements of the Act were met.

Upon examining the material presented, including the declaration of Mr. Christopher John Clark of the Applicant, the Deputy President concluded that the notification time for the proposed agreement was appropriate and that the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act had been met. The court was satisfied that the Applicant had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the Respondent, and the proposed questions in the ballot order were appropriate. Consequently, the application for a protected action ballot order was granted.

The final orders issued by the Deputy President included granting the application for a protected action ballot order and issuing an order in PR743950. The decision was based on the material presented and the satisfaction of the requirements of the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.