Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 2457


[2025] FWC 2457

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd

(B2025/1319)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 21 AUGUST 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd (Ford or Employer). 

  1. I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) have made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.[1]

  1. On 20 August 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application. 

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. 

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Luke Mansfield, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Ford, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. 

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. 

  1. I observe that the application provided in this matter contained certain observations about the CEPU’s preference in relation to the finalisation of the list of voters. These were not in a form suitable for inclusion in the Order. In that light, I have issued the Order using the Commission’s standard approach without issuing any further directions, noting the role to be played by the Act and associated regulations in the conduct of the ballot. I also observe that the Ballot Agent may have regard to the proposals set out in the application to the extent that they are consistent with the Order and the proper conduct of a ballot of this kind.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 4 September 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR790902.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. 

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1317.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR790903>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2457
Case
[2025] FWC 2457
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) has applied to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) for a protected action ballot order concerning employees of Ford Motor Company of Australia Pty Ltd. This application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) has separately applied for a ballot order for the same proposed agreement. The FWC determined the matter based on the provided documentation, including a declaration from CEPU’s Organiser, Luke Mansfield, confirming the union’s efforts in bargaining with Ford. Ford did not oppose the application.

The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the requirements for a protected action ballot order were met. This included determining if there was a notification period for the proposed agreement and if all procedural requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were satisfied. The FWC also needed to confirm the eligibility of Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd as a ballot agent. Additionally, the Commission needed to set a closing date for the ballot, which would also serve as the ballot period for compulsory conciliation under section 448A(2) of the Act.

The FWC found that all requirements for a protected action ballot order were met, including the notification period and the union’s good-faith bargaining efforts. Vero was confirmed as an approved ballot agent. The Commission set the ballot closing date as 4 September 2025, which aligns with the requested 10 working days from the order date. The FWC issued the order using its standard approach, noting that any ballot agent proposals consistent with the order and proper ballot conduct would be considered. The FWC also noted that the ballot agent might take into account the union’s voter list preferences, as long as they were consistent with the order and regulations. A separate order was issued in PR790902, and the matter was assigned to another FWC member for the compulsory conciliation conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.