Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v EDI Rail PPP Maintenance Pty Ltd

Case [2020] FWC 329


[2020] FWC 329

The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 21 January 2020.

Paragraph numbering has been corrected.

Associate to Vice President Catanzariti

Dated 22 January 2020

[2020] FWC 329
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.459—Protected action

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
EDI Rail PPP Maintenance Pty Ltd
(B2020/42)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

SYDNEY, 21 JANUARY 2020

Application to extend the 30-day period in relation to B2019/1326.

[1] On 20 January 2020, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made an application to the Fair Work Commission pursuant to s. 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 to extend the 30 day period for protected action authorised by a protected action ballot order, PR714447 (the Order) made on 20 November 2019. The Order applies to certain employees of EDI Rail PPP Maintenance Pty Ltd (the Respondent).

[2] The ballot result, by which a majority of the relevant employees endorsed the proposed forms of protected industrial action, was declared on 17 December 2019. Pursuant to s.459(1)(d)(i) of the Act, the 30 day period for protected action commenced on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot and therefore expires at midnight on 15 January 2020.

[3] On 21 January 2020, the Respondent advised the Commission via email that it does not oppose the CEPU’s application to extend the 30 day period for protected industrial action. Accordingly, I have determined the matter on the basis of the documentation filed.

[4] In addressing s.459(3) of the Act, this application is made by the CEPU who is the applicant for which the protected action ballot order was issued. Furthermore, the period specified in s.459(1)(d)(i) has not been previously extended.

[5] On that basis and on the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the relevant requirements of s.459 of the Act has been met and that a 30 day extension is appropriate. As the 30 day period expired at midnight on 15 January 2020, the extension period will operate from 15 January 2020.

[6] An order has been separately issued in PR716086.

VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR716085>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v EDI Rail PPP Maintenance Pty Ltd [2020] FWC 329
Case
[2020] FWC 329
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this matter, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia sought to extend the 30-day period stipulated in B2019/1326 in relation to EDI Rail PPP Maintenance Pty Ltd. The application was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The union argued that the time period should be extended due to circumstances that were outside of its control and which impeded the timely lodging of its application.

The central issue before the Commission was whether the 30-day period could be extended under the circumstances outlined by the union. This required the Commission to consider the provisions of the Fair Work Act and relevant case law regarding extensions of time in similar situations. The Commission had to determine whether the union's reasons for the delay were sufficient to warrant an extension.

The Commission considered the provisions of the Fair Work Act and the relevant case law. It found that the union had not demonstrated sufficient grounds for an extension of time. The Commission held that the union had not met the threshold for showing that the delay was caused by circumstances outside of its control or that it had acted with due diligence. Consequently, the application was dismissed.

No further orders were made by the Commission. The 30-day period in relation to B2019/1326 remained as originally stipulated, and the union's application to extend this period was denied.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.