| [2024] FWC 2876 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Dematic Pty Ltd
(B2024/1355)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | MELBOURNE, 16 OCTOBER 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Dematic Pty Ltd [Small Residential Sites]
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Dematic Pty Ltd (Dematic or Employer).
The parties are bargaining for an enterprise agreement to replace the Dematic Pty Limited Small Residential Sites Enterprise Agreement 2015.
On 16 October 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Chelsea Hill, Legal and Industrial Admin Facilitator, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Dematic, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 28 November 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR780318.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, thirty (30) working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR780319>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Dematic Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 2876
- Case
- [2024] FWC 2876
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court needed to address were whether the CEPU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Dematic Pty Ltd and if all the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot had been fulfilled. The court reviewed the evidence, including the declaration by Chelsea Hill, the Legal and Industrial Admin Facilitator, who confirmed the union's efforts to negotiate in good faith and the fulfillment of the notification time under section 443(1) of the Act. The Deputy President found that the union had met all necessary criteria and approved the application for a ballot.
The Deputy President granted the application and set the closing date for voting on the proposed agreement as 28 November 2024, which also established the ballot period. The Australian Electoral Commission was designated to conduct the ballot. Additionally, the matter was referred to another member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act. This member would issue an order for all bargaining representatives to attend and negotiate meaningfully, potentially including directions to ensure effective participation in the conference.
An order was issued under PR780318, and the case was assigned to another member of the Commission for the compulsory conciliation conference. This member would require the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement and likely issue directions to ensure meaningful negotiations took place.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.