Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Contact Electrical Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2012] FWA 8137
•19 SEPTEMBER 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Contact Electrical Pty Ltd [2012] FWA 8137
[2012] FWA 8137
19 SEPTEMBER 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involved the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and Contact Electrical Pty Ltd. The union sought a bargaining order following negotiations for a new enterprise agreement. The union claimed that Contact Electrical amended a draft agreement and presented it for a vote without the union's knowledge or consent. The court had to determine whether a bargaining order was warranted under the Fair Work Act 2009.
The legal issues before the court were whether the employer's conduct in amending and voting on the draft agreement without union knowledge constituted a breach of the good faith bargaining obligations under the Fair Work Act and if so, whether a bargaining order was appropriate. The union argued that the employer's actions demonstrated a failure to bargain in good faith and warranted the court's intervention to restore fair bargaining.
The court found that the employer's conduct did indeed breach the good faith bargaining obligations. The employer's unilateral amendment and voting on the draft agreement without the union's knowledge or consent was considered an improper interference with the union's right to meaningful participation in the bargaining process. Consequently, the court determined that a bargaining order was necessary to rectify the situation and ensure fair and meaningful bargaining in the future. The court ordered that the parties must engage in good faith bargaining to reach a new enterprise agreement.
The legal issues before the court were whether the employer's conduct in amending and voting on the draft agreement without union knowledge constituted a breach of the good faith bargaining obligations under the Fair Work Act and if so, whether a bargaining order was appropriate. The union argued that the employer's actions demonstrated a failure to bargain in good faith and warranted the court's intervention to restore fair bargaining.
The court found that the employer's conduct did indeed breach the good faith bargaining obligations. The employer's unilateral amendment and voting on the draft agreement without the union's knowledge or consent was considered an improper interference with the union's right to meaningful participation in the bargaining process. Consequently, the court determined that a bargaining order was necessary to rectify the situation and ensure fair and meaningful bargaining in the future. The court ordered that the parties must engage in good faith bargaining to reach a new enterprise agreement.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Collective Bargaining
-
Bargaining Order
-
Enterprise Agreement
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union [2020] FWC 1787
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Alphington Aged Care
[2009] FWA 301
National Union of Workers v Defries Industries Pty Ltd
[2009] FWA 88
National Union of Workers v Ross Cosmetics Australia Pty Ltd
[2012] FWA 3252