Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 1057


[2025] FWC 1057

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd

(B2025/627)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 15 APRIL 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd (Cape Flattery Silica or Employer).

  1. I note that the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU)[1] and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[2] have made separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 15 April 2025, the Commission was advised that the parties had reached a consent position in relation to the inclusion of a clause setting out setting out an agreed position on exemptions that would apply during any period of industrial action and an extended notice period for taking protected industrial action.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to amend the application to reflect the consent position reached and otherwise determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Robert Hill, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Cape Flattery Silica, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 2 May 2025.[3] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The minimum extended notice period of five (5) working days applies to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR786129.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/626.

[2] B2025/628

[3] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR786130>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1057
Case
[2025] FWC 1057
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission was asked to decide on an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) for a protected action ballot order concerning employees of Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Ltd. The CEPU sought to conduct a ballot for protected industrial action in relation to an enterprise agreement, and this application came after separate applications by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union and the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union for similar ballot orders in relation to the same proposed agreement. The Commission noted that the parties had reached a consent position on certain terms of the proposed agreement, including an exemption clause and an extended notice period for industrial action.

The legal issues before the Deputy President were whether the CEPU had met the statutory requirements to apply for a ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 and if the exceptional circumstances existed to justify the extended notice period for industrial action under section 443(5) of the Act. The Deputy President examined the evidence provided by the CEPU, including a declaration from an organiser confirming the union's efforts in bargaining and the existence of a notification time for the proposed agreement. The Commission also had to determine the closing date for the ballot to ensure compliance with the Act.

In reaching a decision, the Deputy President found that the CEPU had fulfilled the necessary conditions for applying for a ballot order. The union had provided sufficient evidence of its genuine bargaining efforts and the existence of a notification time. The Deputy President accepted that the proposed ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, was appropriately authorised to conduct the ballot. The closing date for voting was set as 2 May 2025, which also determined the ballot period. The exceptional circumstances justifying the extended notice period for industrial action were deemed sufficient, and the minimum extended notice period of five working days was applied to the specified items in the agreement.

Consequently, the Deputy President granted the application and issued an order reflecting the consent position on the exemption clause and the extended notice period. The matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference, with an order to be issued requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives at the conference to negotiate the proposed enterprise agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.