Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Bisalloy Steels Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWC 1736


[2023] FWC 1736

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Bisalloy Steels Pty Ltd

(B2023/715)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 18 JULY 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Bisalloy Steels Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of the Respondent, Bisalloy Steels Pty Ltd (Bisalloy Steels or Respondent)

  1. On 18 July 2023, the Commission was advised that the Respondent did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.  

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Stewart Edward, CEPU Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Bisalloy Steels, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.  

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) and s.448A(2) of the Act, a ballot period of 30 working days from the date of the Order (18 July 2023) has been established by this Commission.[1]  

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR764316.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A conference in conjunction with related matters, B2023/709 and B2023/713. To the extent that this matter involves additional bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement, the Commission will issue a further Order requiring their attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is the minimum period required by the Australian Electoral Commission.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR764317>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Bisalloy Steels Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 1736
Case
[2023] FWC 1736
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission considered an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Bisalloy Steels Pty Ltd. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Respondent, Bisalloy Steels Pty Ltd, did not object to the application, which was therefore determined on the papers without a hearing. The Deputy President Hampton was satisfied that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act had been met, including the notification time and the union's genuine attempt to reach an agreement with the Respondent.

The legal issues before the Court were whether the CEPU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Bisalloy Steels and whether all the requirements for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Act had been satisfied. The Deputy President Hampton found that the CEPU had indeed been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the Respondent and that all the requirements for the ballot order had been met. Consequently, the Deputy President Hampton was satisfied that the application should be granted.

The Fair Work Commission granted the CEPU's application for a protected action ballot order, establishing a ballot period of 30 working days from the date of the Order. The ballot was to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the section 448A conference in conjunction with related matters, B2023/709 and B2023/713. Further orders will be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.