| [2022] FWC 2620 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
BHP Coal Pty Ltd
(B2022/1418)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 28 SEPTEMBER 2022 |
Proposed protected action ballot by employees of BHP Coal Pty Ltd
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (ETU) (Applicant) has made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) for a Protected Action Ballot Order (the Order) in relation to a group of employees of BHP Coal Pty Ltd (Respondent).
Discussions were held between the parties with respect to the terms of the Order and Directions sought by the Applicant. Several amendments to the Order and Directions were proposed by the Respondent. The Applicant advised the Commission on 27 September 2022 that the Applicant had accepted the proposed amendments and the terms of the draft Order and Directions sought in the application were amended accordingly. The Respondent has confirmed that it does not consent to the Order sought, nor does it wish to be heard further in relation to the matter.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Craig Thomas for the Applicant declared on 19 September 2022, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The Applicant has specified in the application for a protected action ballot order that it wishes a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission to be the protected action ballot agent and has specified IRIQ Law Pty Ltd for this purpose. A statutory declaration has been made by Mr Faiyaz Devjee, the Principal of IRIQ Law Pty Ltd, the individual who will carry out the functions of the protected action ballot agent.
Based on the statutory declaration made by Mr Devjee, I am satisfied as required by s. 444(1)(b)(i) that Mr Devjee is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied, based on the statutory declaration, that as provided in s. 444(1)(b)(ii) of the Act, the requirements in Regulation 3.11 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 have been met.
An Order and Directions to the ballot agent have been separately issued in PR746307 and PR746308 respectively.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR746305>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 2620
- Case
- [2022] FWC 2620
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the requirements for granting the Protected Action Ballot Order were satisfied. This involved examining whether there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement, and if the ETU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with BHP Coal Pty Ltd. Additionally, the Deputy President needed to be satisfied that the specified ballot agent, IRIQ Law Pty Ltd, was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot, and that the relevant requirements under the Fair Work Regulations 2009 had been met.
After reviewing the material before the court, including the statutory declaration of Craig Thomas for the ETU and the statutory declaration of Mr Faiyaz Devjee for IRIQ Law Pty Ltd, the Deputy President found that the requirements for granting the Protected Action Ballot Order were met. The Deputy President was satisfied that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement, and that the ETU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with BHP Coal Pty Ltd. Furthermore, the Deputy President was satisfied that Mr Devjee was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot and that the requirements in Regulation 3.11 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 had been met.
The final orders issued by the Deputy President granted the Protected Action Ballot Order, specifying IRIQ Law Pty Ltd as the ballot agent. Directions to the ballot agent were separately issued in PR746307 and PR746308.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.