| [2021] FWC 3795 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Beach Energy Services Pty Limited
(B2021/472)
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 1 JULY 2021 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Beach Energy Services Pty Limited.
[1] This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australiamade under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Beach Energy Services Pty Limited (Respondent).
[2] On 30 June 2021, my associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.
[3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
[4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Chelsea Hill of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
[5] An order has been separately issued in PR731211.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR731220>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Beach Energy Services Pty Limited [2021] FWC 3795
- Case
- [2021] FWC 3795
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Union's proposed ballot fell within the scope of protected industrial action as outlined in the Fair Work Act 2009. Additionally, the court had to determine if Beach Energy was required to provide the necessary assistance to the Union to conduct the ballot, in line with the provisions of the Fair Work Act.
In its decision, the court found that the Union's proposed ballot was indeed protected action under the Act, as it sought to improve the employees' working conditions. The court further ruled that Beach Energy was obligated to provide the necessary assistance for the ballot to proceed. The Union's request for an order was granted, and Beach Energy was directed to facilitate the ballot as required by the Fair Work Act. The court's decision underscored the importance of protecting the rights of employees to engage in protected industrial action and the corresponding obligations of employers to facilitate such actions within the legal framework.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.