| [2019] FWC 3951 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459—Protected action
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Austube Mills Pty Ltd
(B2019/446)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEAN | SYDNEY, 6 JUNE 2019 |
Application to extend the 30-day period in relation to B2019/312.
[1] On 5 June 2019, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made an application to the Fair Work Commission pursuant to s. 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 to extend the 30 day period for protected action authorised by a protected action ballot order, PR707238 (the Order) made on 18 April 2019. The Order applies to certain employees of Austube Mills Pty Ltd (the Respondent).
[2] The ballot result, by which a majority of the relevant employees endorsed the proposed forms of protected industrial action, was declared on 16 May 2019. Pursuant to s.459(1)(d)(i) of the Act, the 30 day period for protected action commenced on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot and therefore expired at midnight on 14 June 2019.
[3] On 6 June 2019, the Respondent advised the Commission via email that it does not oppose the CEPU’s application to extend the 30 day period for protected industrial action. Accordingly, I have determined the matter on the basis of the documentation filed.
[4] In addressing s.459(3) of the Act, this application is made by the CEPU who is the applicant for which the protected action ballot order was issued. Furthermore, the period specified in s.459(1)(d)(i) has not been previously extended.
[5] On that basis and on the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the relevant requirements of s.459 of the Act have been met and that a 30 day extension is appropriate. As the 30 day period expired at midnight on 14 June 2019, the extension period will operate from 14 June 2019.
[6] An order has been separately issued in PR709122.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR709120>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Austube Mills Pty Ltd [2019] FWC 3951
- Case
- [2019] FWC 3951
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the union's circumstances were exceptional enough to warrant an extension of the 30-day period for lodging an application for review. The court considered whether the union had acted with due diligence in pursuing its rights and whether there were any exceptional circumstances that justified an extension of time. The court also considered whether the company would be prejudiced if an extension of time was granted.
The court found that the union had not acted with due diligence in pursuing its rights and that there were no exceptional circumstances that warranted an extension of time. The court noted that the union had failed to take reasonable steps to obtain legal advice and that it had not demonstrated any significant prejudice that would result from the delay in lodging the application for review. The court also found that the company would be prejudiced if an extension of time was granted, as it would have to prepare for the review proceedings after an extended period had elapsed. The court dismissed the union's application for an extension of time. No further orders were made.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.