| [2023] FWC 1987 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Altus Traffic Pty Ltd T/A Altus Traffic
(B2023/821)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 10 AUGUST 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Altus Traffic Pty. Ltd.
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Altus Traffic Pty Ltd T/A Altus Traffic (Altus Traffic or Employer).
On 10 August 2023, the Commission was advised that Altus Traffic did not object to the Application. The Commission subsequently confirmed its intended approach to the definition of the group of employees to be balloted; being that Clause 3 of the proposed order would reflect the answer given by the Applicant under question 2.1 of the F34. No objections were raised by either party.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Chris Clark on behalf of the CEPU, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Altus Traffic, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 21 September 2023.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An order has been separately issued in PR765041.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order, which is the period required by the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct a ballot.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR765042>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Altus Traffic Pty Ltd T/A Altus Traffic [2023] FWC 1987
- Case
- [2023] FWC 1987
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the conditions outlined in section 443 of the Act were satisfied, specifically focusing on the notification period and the requirement that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer. The Deputy President considered the declaration by Mr Chris Clark on behalf of the CEPU, which detailed the steps taken by the union in bargaining with the employer and confirmed that the union had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement. The declaration and other materials before the Commission were sufficient to satisfy the Deputy President that all requirements for a ballot order were met.
Having reviewed the materials and satisfied with the declaration and lack of objections, the Deputy President decided to grant the application. An order was issued that the ballot be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission, with voting to close on 21 September 2023. This date establishes the ballot period for the purposes of section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter was also assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A, with directions to ensure meaningful negotiations occur.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.