| [2023] FWCA 1822 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2023/1883)
MULGRAVE INSULATION (QLD) PTY LTD AND CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION LAGGING UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2021-2024
| Plumbing industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 21 JUNE 2023 |
Application for approval of the Mulgrave Insulation (Qld) Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Lagging Union Collective Agreement 2021-2024
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mulgrave Insulation (Qld) Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Lagging Union Collective Agreement 2021-2024 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval has been met. In accordance with s 187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CEPU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
I note that the Agreement was made with the CEPU and therefore covers this organisation (see s 53(2)(b)).
The Agreement was approved on 21 June 2023 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 28 June 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE520429 PR763422>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2023] FWCA 1822
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 1822
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was a "better off overall test" (BOOT) agreement, meaning that the overall conditions of employment under the agreement were better than those provided by the relevant award or safety net. The Commission also had to determine whether the agreement was compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it contained any provisions that were contrary to public policy or were otherwise invalid.
The Commission found that the agreement was a BOOT agreement, as it provided better overall conditions of employment for the Union members than the relevant award. The Commission also found that the agreement was compliant with the Fair Work Act, except for a few minor technical issues that the parties had agreed to rectify. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to the parties addressing the minor technical issues.
The Commission's decision was based on its assessment of the evidence presented by the parties and its consideration of the relevant legal framework. The Commission found that the Union had demonstrated that the agreement provided better overall conditions of employment for its members, and that the agreement was not contrary to public policy or otherwise invalid. The Commission's approval of the agreement was subject to the parties addressing the minor technical issues identified by the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.