| [2023] FWCA 1920 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2023/2041)
J.B. HART ELECTRICS PROPRIETARY LIMITED & ETU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021 – 2025
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 28 JUNE 2023 |
Application for approval of the J.B. Hart Electrics Proprietary Limited & ETU Enterprise Agreement 2021 – 2025
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the J.B. Hart Electrics Proprietary Limited & ETU Enterprise Agreement 2021 – 2025 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.
The CEPU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by 201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the CEPU.
The Agreement was approved on 28 June 2023 and, in accordance with s 54, it will operate from 5 July 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE520522 PR763678>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2023] FWCA 1920
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 1920
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the Commission had to address centred on whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement met the criteria for "better off overall or in the round" (BOOT), meaning that the overall terms and conditions of employment for the employees must be no worse off and some employees must be better off. The Commission also needed to assess whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it contained appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.
In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the agreement in detail, considering the evidence presented by both the union and the employer. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and met the BOOT requirement. It also noted that the agreement contained appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms and was consistent with the broader industrial relations framework. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, finding that it provided a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees and the employer. The Commission's decision was made in the interest of maintaining harmonious industrial relations and ensuring that the agreement would operate effectively in practice.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.