| [2024] FWCA 1361 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2024/1157)
SYFON SYSTEMS PTY LTD AND CEPU - PLUMBING DIVISION – NSW BRANCH PLUMBING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023–2027
| Plumbing industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 17 APRIL 2024 |
Application for approval of the Syfon Systems Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division – NSW Branch Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2023–2027
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Syfon Systems Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division – NSW Branch Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2023–2027 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.
The CEPU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s 201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the CEPU.
The Agreement was approved on 17 April 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524239 PR773587>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2024] FWCA 1361
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1361
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that arose in this case primarily revolved around the procedural and substantive fairness of the proposed agreement. The Commission had to ensure that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the parties, complied with all legislative mandates, and did not unfairly disadvantage any of the employees covered by the agreement. Specific attention was paid to the coverage of employees, the negotiation process, and the contents of the agreement itself, including provisions on wages, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and complied with all procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. The Commission also concluded that the agreement was fair and equitable, as it provided for reasonable terms and conditions of employment and did not unfairly disadvantage any employees. The agreement was thus approved, recognising its compliance with the necessary legislative standards and the fair treatment of employees. The Commission’s decision provided clarity on the terms of the agreement and set a precedent for similar agreements in the industry.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.