| [2024] FWCA 1901 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2024/1575)
FIRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATIONS (NSW) PTY LTD & CEPU NSW/NFIA SPRINKLER FITTING FIRE PROTECTION UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT NSW & ACT 2024-2028
| Fire fighting services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 24 MAY 2024 |
Application for approval of the Fire Sprinkler Installations (NSW) Pty Ltd & CEPU NSW/NFIA Sprinkler Fitting Fire Protection Union Enterprise Agreement NSW & ACT 2024-2028
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Fire Sprinkler Installations (NSW) Pty Ltd & CEPU NSW/NFIA Sprinkler Fitting Fire Protection Union Enterprise Agreement NSW & ACT 2024-2028 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.
The CEPU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s 201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the CEPU.
The Agreement was approved on 24 May 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524751 PR775320>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2024] FWCA 1901
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1901
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the enterprise agreement adhered to the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. This included examining whether the agreement had been made in good faith, whether it included the necessary minimum terms, and if it was fair and reasonable. The union argued that the agreement was appropriately negotiated and beneficial to the employees, while the employer contended that certain provisions were not in compliance with the legislation. The court was required to determine if the agreement met all the necessary legal criteria for approval.
The Fair Work Commission reviewed the agreement in detail, considering the submissions from both parties. It found that while most of the agreement was in order, there were some provisions that did not meet the statutory requirements. Despite these issues, the Commission determined that the overall agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the benefits it provided to the employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement with certain modifications to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act.
The final orders of the Commission were that the enterprise agreement be approved with specific amendments to address the non-compliant provisions. The changes ensured that the agreement would meet the legal standards required for approval, while still providing the intended benefits to the union members. This decision highlights the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements are both fair to employees and compliant with relevant legislation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.