| [2024] FWCA 2161 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2024/1891)
WALKER FIRE PROTECTION PTY LTD AND CEPU – PLUMBING DIVISION (VIC) FIRE PROTECTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 – 2027
| Plumbing industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 13 JUNE 2024 |
Application for approval of the Walker Fire Protection Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Fire Protection Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Walker Fire Protection Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Fire Protection Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.
The CEPU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s 201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the CEPU.
The Agreement was approved on 13 June 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524996 PR775926>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2024] FWCA 2161
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 2161
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue that the court had to address was whether the enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement had been fairly negotiated, if it included the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and if it was free from any prohibited content. The court also had to consider whether the agreement was likely to have a detrimental effect on the broader industrial relations system.
In its reasoning, the court meticulously examined the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. The court found that the agreement had been fairly negotiated and contained all the required minimum terms and conditions. It also concluded that the agreement did not include any prohibited content and was not likely to have a detrimental effect on the industrial relations system. Therefore, the court approved the enterprise agreement, recognising it as a valid and enforceable document between the parties involved. The court's decision provided clarity and certainty for both the employer and the union regarding the terms and conditions of employment for the period covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.