| [2024] FWCA 2815 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2024/2701)
MANSON PLUMBING (VIC) PTY LTD AND CEPU – PLUMBING DIVISION (VIC) PLUMBING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 – 2027
| Plumbing industry | |
| COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 31 JULY 2024 |
Application for approval of the Manson Plumbing (Vic) Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Manson Plumbing (Vic) Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 August 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2027.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE525640 PR777714>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2024] FWCA 2815
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 2815
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement met the formal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act and if it contained provisions that were in the best interests of the employees, including whether it allowed for fair and reasonable terms of employment. Specifically, the Commission had to assess the agreement's compliance with the "better off overall test" to ensure that the employees would not be worse off financially or in terms of working conditions compared to their previous arrangements.
In determining the application, the Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties, the fairness of the terms, and the compliance of the agreement with the statutory requirements. The Commission found that the agreement satisfied the formal requirements of the Act and met the "better off overall test". It was noted that the agreement provided for reasonable pay and conditions, and the benefits to the employees outweighed any potential disadvantages. The Commission approved the agreement, recognising its provisions as fair and in the best interests of the employees. Consequently, the agreement was authorised to become effective from the specified date, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the approved agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.