Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

Case [2024] FWCA 3504


[2024] FWCA 3504

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

(AG2024/3792)

MECA ELECTRICAL SERVICES PTY LTD & ETU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021 – 2025

Electrical contracting industry

COMMISSIONER JOHNS

MELBOURNE, 4 OCTOBER 2024

Application for approval of the Meca Electrical Services Pty Ltd and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Meca Electrical Services Pty Ltd and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. An assessment of the Agreement has identified two clauses that may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES).  In particular, the terms relating to:

a)Part A Clause 35.4(a)(ii): Public holidays – substitution to another day

b)Part A Clause 20.1(a) and Part B Clause 20.1(a): Notice of termination – exclusion of apprentices

  1. Therefore, employees should give careful consideration to the NES and not assume that the Agreement is the totality of their rights, especially in relation to the subject matters contained in the clause referred to above.

  1. Noting the NES precedence clause (Clause 4.1(b)), to the extent that any clause in the Agreement is inconsistent with the NES, it is not an impediment to the approval of the Agreement.

  1. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 October 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE526307  PR779964>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2024] FWCA 3504
Case
[2024] FWCA 3504
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and Meca Electrical Services Pty Ltd. The union had submitted an application for the approval of the Meca Electrical Services Pty Ltd and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025. The dispute centred around whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and if it was in the best interests of the employees. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with examining the terms of the agreement, including wages, working conditions, and other employment-related provisions.

The central legal issues that the commission had to address were whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly in terms of minimum entitlements and the ‘better off overall test’. The commission also had to consider if the agreement would promote harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations and whether it was free from coercion and undue influence. The court needed to ensure that the agreement was fair and reasonable, providing employees with appropriate protections and benefits.

In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission carefully reviewed the proposed enterprise agreement. The commission found that the agreement met the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act. It was determined that the agreement provided employees with fair wages and conditions and met the ‘better off overall test’. The commission also noted that the agreement would foster productive workplace relations and was free from any undue influence or coercion. Consequently, the commission approved the Meca Electrical Services Pty Ltd and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025.

The Fair Work Commission ordered the approval of the Meca Electrical Services Pty Ltd and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was set to govern the employment conditions of the employees for the period of 2021 to 2025. The decision underscored the commission's commitment to ensuring that enterprise agreements are fair and provide appropriate protections for employees while also promoting productive workplace relations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.