[2013] FWCA 1374 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2013/353)
COMMTECH COMMISSIONING TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD AND CEPU - PLUMBING DIVISION (VIC) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011 - 2015
Plumbing industry | |
COMMISSIONER BLAIR | MELBOURNE, 5 MARCH 2013 |
Commtech Commissioning Technologies Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division (Vic) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single - agreement known as the Commtech Commissioning Technologies Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division (Vic) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia – Plumbing Division (Vic), being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 March 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE400117 PR534539>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2013] FWCA 1374
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1374
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the enterprise agreement was made in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, specifically whether it was made in good faith and without coercion, and whether it complied with the provisions relating to minimum entitlements. The Commission needed to determine whether the Union's objections had merit and whether the agreement should be certified as a lawful and binding enterprise agreement. Furthermore, the Commission had to assess the fairness of the agreement's terms, particularly regarding overtime pay and the classification of work, to ensure that they were not detrimental to the employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement was made in good faith and without coercion. It considered the negotiation process and the parties' conduct, concluding that the agreement was not procedurally unfair. The Commission also examined the substantive fairness of the agreement's terms and found that they did not contravene the minimum entitlements set out in the Fair Work Act. Regarding the Union's objections, the Commission held that the overtime pay provisions and the classification of work were reasonable and did not unfairly disadvantage the employees. Consequently, the Commission certified the enterprise agreement as a lawful and binding agreement, dismissing the Union's objections.
The Fair Work Commission certified the CEPU - Plumbing Division (Vic) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 as a lawful and binding enterprise agreement. The Commission dismissed the Union's objections, finding that the agreement was made in good faith, without coercion, and complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission further determined that the agreement's terms, including those relating to overtime pay and the classification of work, were fair and did not contravene the minimum entitlements set out in the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.