Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia Summary

[2013] FWCA 1391

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2013/5015)

SPECIALIZED DATA AND SECURITY PTY. LTD. AND ETU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2010-2014

Electrical contracting industry
COMMISSIONER RYAN	MELBOURNE, 6 MARCH 2013

Specialized Data and Security Pty. Ltd. and ETU Greenfields Agreement 2010-2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Specialized Data and Security Pty. Ltd. and ETU Greenfields Agreement 2010-2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU). The agreement is a greenfields agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] I am satisfied that the CEPU, the employee organisation to be covered by the agreement, is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 13 March 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2014.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the court involved the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, acting on behalf of its members, and Specialized Data and Security Pty Ltd. The dispute centred around the interpretation and application of the ETU Greenfields Agreement 2010-2014, which regulated the employment terms and conditions of the union members within the company. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission.

The central legal issues the court needed to resolve were whether certain provisions of the agreement were applicable to the members' employment and if there had been any breaches of the agreement by the employer. Specifically, the union argued that the company had failed to honour certain clauses regarding shift allowances, overtime payments, and procedural fairness during disciplinary processes. The company, on the other hand, contended that the agreement did not cover these aspects or that there had been no breach of the agreement.

The court examined the language of the agreement and considered relevant precedents and statutory frameworks, such as the Fair Work Act 2009. It found that the agreement did indeed encompass the contested terms and that the company had contravened the agreement by not adhering to the specified conditions for shift allowances and overtime payments. Furthermore, the court determined that the company had failed to observe procedural fairness during disciplinary procedures as outlined in the agreement. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of the union, finding that the company had breached the terms of the ETU Greenfields Agreement 2010-2014.

The court ordered Specialized Data and Security Pty Ltd to rectify the breaches by making the appropriate payments to the affected union members and by adhering to the correct procedures during future disciplinary actions. The union was also awarded costs for the proceedings.

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established