[2013] FWCA 2589 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2013/967)
H & P REFRIGERATION ENGINEERS PTY LTD AND THE CEPU-PLUMBING DIVISION (VIC) COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION AGREEMENT 2012-2015
Plumbing industry | |
COMMISSIONER BLAIR | MELBOURNE, 29 APRIL 2013 |
Application for approval of the H & P Refrigeration Engineers Pty Ltd and the CEPU-Plumbing Division (Vic) Commercial Refrigeration Agreement 2012-2015
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the H & P Refrigeration Engineers Pty Ltd and the CEPU-Plumbing Division (Vic) Commercial Refrigeration Agreement 2012-2015 (the Agreement), pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The CEPU, being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 May 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE400981 PR536070>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2013] FWCA 2589
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2589
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue that the Commission was required to decide was whether the application for approval should be granted. To do so, the Commission needed to consider whether the agreement was a "better off overall test" (BOOT) agreement, meaning that the overall terms and conditions of the agreement were no worse than those provided by the relevant award or registered agreement, and whether it was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.
In reaching its decision, the Commission noted that the agreement provided for wages and conditions that were no worse than those provided by the relevant award or registered agreement. The Commission also noted that the agreement provided for a number of benefits, including the establishment of a training and apprenticeship fund, which was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission found that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and granted the application for approval. The Commission made an order approving the agreement as a BOOT agreement and as being in the best interests of the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.