Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

Case [2013] FWCA 7076


[2013] FWCA 7076

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2013/2844)

THE QUANTUM TECHNICAL SERVICES/NESTLES CAMPBELLFIELD AND CEPU - PLUMBING DIVISION (VIC) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2016

Plumbing industry

COMMISSIONER BLAIR

MELBOURNE, 17 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of The Quantum Technical Services/Nestles Campbellfield and CEPU - Plumbing Division (Vic) Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as The Quantum Technical Services/Nestles Campbellfield and CEPU - Plumbing Division (Vic) Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU).

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[3] The CEPU, being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2016.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code 48, AE404108  PR541908>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2013] FWCA 7076
Case
[2013] FWCA 7076
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia for the approval of the Quantum Technical Services/Nestles Campbellfield and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016. The dispute arose under the Fair Work Act 2009 and was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The primary issue before the court was whether the enterprise agreement should be approved by the Commission, taking into account various statutory criteria, including whether it facilitated the efficient operation of the enterprise, promoted economic prosperity, and was free from any elements that would result in unfair treatment of employees.

In addressing the legal issues, the court examined the agreement's provisions concerning wages, conditions, and other employment terms. The Commission assessed the agreement against the statutory criteria, considering the balance of rights and obligations, and the overall fairness of the agreement. The court gave particular attention to the provisions related to wages, overtime, and shift penalties, as well as the dispute resolution mechanisms included within the agreement. The Commission noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and was not detrimental to the employees, and that it provided a reasonable framework for the operation of the enterprise.

The Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission concluded that the agreement facilitated the efficient operation of the enterprise, promoted economic prosperity, and was free from any elements that would result in unfair treatment of employees. The court approved the agreement, acknowledging the parties' commitment to negotiating a fair and balanced outcome that met the statutory criteria. The Commission's decision to approve the agreement was based on a comprehensive assessment of the terms and conditions, and the overall fairness of the agreement to both the employer and the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.