[2013] FWCA 8478 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2013/10868)
SYFON SYSTEMS PTY LTD AND CEPU (WA) UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013-2016
Plumbing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 28 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Syfon Systems Pty Ltd and CEPU (WA) Union Collective Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Syfon Systems Pty Ltd and CEPU (WA) Union Collective Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE405042 PR543880>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2013] FWCA 8478
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8478
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the Agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether the terms and conditions of the Agreement were fair and reasonable. The Applicant argued that the Agreement was appropriate and necessary to ensure fair and reasonable terms of employment for the employees. The Respondent, on the other hand, raised concerns about certain provisions of the Agreement, arguing that they were not fair and reasonable.
The Commission found that the Agreement met the statutory requirements for approval and that the terms and conditions were fair and reasonable. The Commission took into account the nature of the industry, the bargaining positions of the parties, and the need to ensure that the Agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment. The Commission also considered the evidence presented by both parties and the submissions made during the hearing. The Commission was satisfied that the Agreement was appropriate and necessary to ensure fair and reasonable terms of employment for the employees.
The Commission approved the Agreement, subject to certain modifications to address the Respondent’s concerns. The modifications related to provisions concerning shift allowances and the calculation of overtime. The Commission considered that these modifications were necessary to ensure that the Agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment. The Applicant and the Respondent were directed to implement the modified Agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.