| [2015] FWCA 3256 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2015/2598)
TRU-FLOW SERVICES PTY LTD AND CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Plumbing industry | |
COMMISSIONER BLAIR | MELBOURNE, 13 MAY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Tru-Flow Services Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Tru-Flow Services Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (“CEPU”).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The CEPU, being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 20 May 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2015.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE413906 PR567315>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2015] FWCA 3256
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 3256
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue that the commission had to address was whether the collective agreement contained terms and conditions that were consistent with the relevant federal legislation, particularly the Fair Work Act 2009. The commission was required to examine the provisions of the agreement, assess their fairness and reasonableness, and determine if they complied with the statutory requirements for approval. Additionally, the commission needed to consider the potential impact of the agreement on the parties involved, including the employees, the employer, and the broader industry.
Upon examination of the agreement, the commission found that while most provisions were in line with the legislative requirements, certain aspects of the agreement required adjustments to ensure compliance with the law. The commission was particularly concerned with provisions that potentially limited the rights of employees to access certain benefits or protections. After careful consideration, the commission determined that the agreement, with some modifications, could be approved, provided the company and the union made necessary amendments to address the commission's concerns. The final outcome was that the commission granted approval of the collective agreement, subject to the implementation of the agreed-upon modifications.
The final orders of the commission required the parties to implement the necessary amendments to the agreement within a specified timeframe. The company and the union were instructed to notify the commission of the completion of these amendments, following which the approved agreement would come into effect. This decision ensures that the terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by the agreement are fair, reasonable, and compliant with the relevant federal legislation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.