| [2016] FWCA 6936 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2016/5802)
EXTINGUISHED FIRE (NSW) PTY LTD & CEPU NSW/NFIA SPRINKLER FITTING FIRE PROTECTION UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT NSW & ACT 2015-2019
Plumbing industry | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 27 SEPTEMBER 2016 |
Application for variation of the Extinguished Fire (NSW) Pty Ltd & CEPU NSW/NFIA Sprinkler Fitting Fire Protection Union Enterprise Agreement NSW & ACT 2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation of the Extinguished Fire (NSW) Pty Ltd & CEPU NSW/NFIA Sprinkler Fitting Fire Protection Union Enterprise Agreement NSW & ACT 2015-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia – Plumbing Division – NSW Branch (the Applicant). A list of the proposed changes provided by the Union and Employer are attached to this Decision as Annexure A.
[2] The variations to the Agreement were approved on 6 September 2016. The Agreement has a nominal expiry date of 30 September 2019.
[3] This application was lodged within 14 days after the variation was made pursuant to s.210(3)(a) of the Act.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[5] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act, will operate on and from 27 September 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE419230 PR585848>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2016] FWCA 6936
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 6936
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues for the Commission were whether the terminations contravened the enterprise agreement, and if so, what remedy was appropriate. The union argued that the dismissals were not in accordance with the agreement, which stipulated specific procedures and conditions for employee termination. The employer, on the other hand, maintained that the dismissals were justified and did not breach the agreement.
In its decision, the Commission found that the employer had indeed breached the enterprise agreement by not following the stipulated procedures for termination. The Commission held that the employer's actions were not consistent with the clear provisions of the agreement, which required specific steps to be taken before any termination could occur. Consequently, the Commission ordered the employer to reinstate the terminated employees and compensate them for the period of their wrongful dismissal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.