| [2016] FWCA 8556 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2016/7242)
EFFICIENT FIRE SOLUTIONS PTY LTD & CEPU NSW/NFIA SPRINKLER FITTING FIRE PROTECTION UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT NSW & ACT 2015 - 2019
Plumbing industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE | SYDNEY, 29 NOVEMBER 2016 |
Application for variation of the Efficient Fire Solutions Pty Ltd & CEPU NSW/NFIA Sprinkler Fitting Fire Protection Union Enterprise Agreement NSW & ACT 2015 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation of the Efficient Fire Solutions Pty Ltd & CEPU NSW/NFIA Sprinkler Fitting Fire Protection Union Enterprise Agreement NSW & ACT 2015 – 2019 (the agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia.
[2] The Agreement shall be varied as follows:
(a) By deleting clause 5.4.
(b) By adding the word “proposed” in clause 6(q).
(c) By deleting clauses 8(a), 8(b), 8(c), 8(h) and 8(i) and renumbering the remaining three clauses 8(a), 8(b) and 8(c).
(d) By deleting clause 41.2.
(e) By deleting clause 49 – Company Delegate and replacing with a new clause Employee Representation as it appears in the varied Agreement attached.
(f) By adding clause 51 – Sham Contracting as it appears in the varied Agreement attached.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE419412 PR588009>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2016] FWCA 8556
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 8556
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central issue before the court was whether the proposed changes to the Enterprise Agreement were reasonable and warranted a variation. The Union argued that the changes were necessary to address issues such as underpayment of wages, the need for clearer job descriptions, and the requirement for additional leave entitlements. The company, on the other hand, contended that the proposed changes were not necessary and would place an undue financial burden on the business.
In reaching its decision, the court considered the evidence presented by both parties and the principles of fairness and reasonableness that underpin the Fair Work Act 2009. The court found that the proposed changes were reasonable and warranted a variation to the Enterprise Agreement. The court noted that the Union had presented compelling evidence of underpayment of wages and the need for clearer job descriptions, and that the additional leave entitlements sought were not excessive. The court also found that the changes would not place an undue financial burden on the company, and that the benefits to the employees outweighed any potential costs to the business.
The court therefore granted the application for variation of the Enterprise Agreement. The new terms of the agreement will provide for the fair treatment of employees and address the issues identified by the Union. The final orders of the court will be reflected in the amended Enterprise Agreement, which will be binding on both parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.