Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

Case

[2009] FWA 878

29 OCTOBER 2009


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2009] FWA 878 [2009] FWA 878 29 OCTOBER 2009

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The dispute in this case involved the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, who sought to conduct a ballot of employees of the Australian Postal Corporation (Australia Post) regarding potential industrial action. The Union's application was contested by Australia Post, resulting in proceedings before the Fair Work Commission. The legal issues centred on whether the proposed ballot was compliant with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically concerning the timing and content of the ballot papers. The Union argued that the ballot was lawful and necessary for the protection of employees' rights and interests, while Australia Post contended that the ballot was not in accordance with the statutory requirements.

The Fair Work Commission examined the statutory provisions and the arguments presented by both parties. The Union's proposed ballot papers included questions that sought to determine employees' willingness to take protected action, such as stoppages of work, and also included options for alternative actions, such as working to rule. The Commission considered whether the inclusion of these alternative actions in the ballot papers was permissible under the Act, and whether the timing of the ballot was appropriate given the ongoing negotiations between the parties. The Commission found that the inclusion of alternative actions in the ballot papers was not in breach of the statutory provisions, and that the timing of the ballot was not unreasonable. The Commission concluded that the Union's proposed ballot was compliant with the requirements of the Act.

In light of the Commission's determination, the Union's application for authorisation to conduct the ballot was granted. The Court upheld the Commission's decision, finding that the Union had satisfied the legal criteria for conducting the ballot. The orders of the Fair Work Commission were affirmed, and the Union was authorised to proceed with the proposed ballot of employees of the Australian Postal Corporation. This decision provides guidance for unions and employers in relation to the conduct of protected action ballots, and the requirements for compliance with the Fair Work Act.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Employment & Labour Law

Legal Concepts

  • Proposed protected action ballot

  • Unconscionable Conduct

  • Collective Bargaining