| [2020] FWCA 6957 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2020/3790)
SOUTHERN CROSS FIRE PTY LTD AND CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION FIRE SERVICES UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2019 – 2022
Plumbing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 21 DECEMBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the Southern Cross Fire Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Fire Services Union Collective Agreement 2019 – 2022.
[1] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Southern Cross Fire Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Fire Services Union Collective Agreement 2019 – 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 21 December 2020 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 28 December 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509911 PR725713>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2020] FWCA 6957
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 6957
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement was a lawful and fair one. The union argued that the agreement was a good faith bargain and was in line with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The employer, on the other hand, argued that the agreement was not a genuine bargain and that some of its provisions were unfair. The employer contended that the agreement did not reflect the true intentions of the parties and that some of its provisions were not in the best interests of the business.
The Commission found that the agreement was a genuine bargain and was in line with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The Commission noted that the parties had negotiated the agreement in good faith and that the agreement reflected the true intentions of both parties. The Commission also found that the provisions of the agreement were not unfair and were in the best interests of both parties. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable set of terms and conditions of employment that balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain minor modifications to ensure that it complied with the relevant legislation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.