Commonwealth of Australia Represented by the Productivity Commission T/A Productivity Commission

Case [2024] FWCA 808


[2024] FWCA 808

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Commonwealth of Australia Represented by the Productivity Commission T/A Productivity Commission

(AG2024/426)

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 – 2027

Commonwealth employment

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON

MELBOURNE, 4 MARCH 2024

Application for approval of the Productivity Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Productivity Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Commonwealth of Australia Represented by the Productivity Commission T/A Productivity Commission. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amending Act) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act, which commenced operation on 6 June 2023. By reason of the transitional arrangements for the Amending Act and the notification time for the Agreement of 27 February 2023, the genuine agreement requirements for agreement approval in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act, as it was just before 6 June 2023 apply to the present application. Further, as the Agreement was made on 13 February 2024 the better off overall test provisions in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act as amended on 6 June 2023 apply.

  1. Correspondence was sent to the Employer by my chambers on 29 February 2024 raising the concern that clause 14.2 of the Australian Public Service Enterprise Award 2015[1] provides a penalty of 250% for work performed on public holidays, whereas clauses 149.1 and 150 of the Agreement provide a reduced penalty of 150% for work performed on a public holiday. The Employer responded on 4 March 2024 submitting that requiring or directing employees to work on a public holiday is not a pattern of work that is reasonably foreseeable, given the Employer’s operational requirements and usual work practices. I am consequently satisfied that per s.193A(6A) of the Act, requiring employees to perform work on a public holiday is not a pattern of work that is reasonably foreseeable for the purposes of s.193A(6A) of the Act and the better off overall test.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Community and Public Sector Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 March 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 February 2027.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] MA000124.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE523724  PR772041>

Details
AGLC
Commonwealth of Australia Represented by the Productivity Commission T/A Productivity Commission [2024] FWCA 808
Case
[2024] FWCA 808
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved the Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Productivity Commission, and was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The dispute centred around the application for approval of the Productivity Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027. The commission sought to approve the agreement to regulate the terms and conditions of employment for its employees.

The primary legal issues the court had to address included whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the statutory requirements for approval. This included examining the fairness and reasonableness of the agreement, ensuring it adhered to the minimum entitlements under the Fair Work Act, and whether it appropriately addressed the needs of the employees and the commission.

In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission carefully considered the provisions of the agreement, the submissions from the Productivity Commission, and the statutory criteria for approval. The court found that the agreement was fair and reasonable, met the minimum entitlements required by law, and appropriately balanced the interests of both the employees and the commission. Consequently, the application for approval was successful.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Productivity Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was deemed to be compliant with all statutory requirements and was recognised as a valid and enforceable enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.