Commonwealth of Australia (As Represented By the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development) v Stephens (No.3)

Case

[2017] FCCA 1385

23 June 2017


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Commonwealth of Australia (As Represented By the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development) v Stephens (No.3) [2017] FCCA 1385 [2017] FCCA 1385 23 June 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development, was the applicant in proceedings before Smith J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia concerning a tenancy dispute. The respondent was Mr. Stephens.

The primary legal issue before the Court was the determination of costs following the determination of the substantive tenancy dispute. Specifically, the Court was required to decide whether the successful party should be awarded costs and, if so, how those costs should be calculated, with reference to Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth).

Smith J determined that the successful party should be awarded costs. The Court proceeded to calculate these costs by applying the scale set out in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth). The Court also ordered that the costs order be stayed pending any appeal to the Federal Court of Australia.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Appeal

  • Stay of Proceedings

  • Jurisdiction