Commonwealth of Australia (As Represented By the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development) v Shirvington (No.5)
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1368
•23 June 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Commonwealth of Australia (As Represented By the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development) v Shirvington (No.5) [2017] FCCA 1368
[2017] FCCA 1368
23 June 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development, was the applicant in proceedings before Smith J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia concerning a tenancy dispute with the respondent, Shirvington. The primary dispute revolved around the determination of costs following earlier proceedings.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the successful party, the Commonwealth, should be awarded its costs, and if so, how those costs should be calculated. Specifically, the Court was required to consider the application of Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the *Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001* (Cth) in determining the quantum of the costs awarded.
Smith J reasoned that the Commonwealth, as the successful party, was generally entitled to an award of costs. The Court then proceeded to calculate these costs by reference to the relevant provisions of the *Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001*. The Court noted that a stay of the costs order had been sought pending an appeal to the Federal Court of Australia, but ultimately determined the quantum of costs to be awarded.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the successful party, the Commonwealth, should be awarded its costs, and if so, how those costs should be calculated. Specifically, the Court was required to consider the application of Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the *Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001* (Cth) in determining the quantum of the costs awarded.
Smith J reasoned that the Commonwealth, as the successful party, was generally entitled to an award of costs. The Court then proceeded to calculate these costs by reference to the relevant provisions of the *Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001*. The Court noted that a stay of the costs order had been sought pending an appeal to the Federal Court of Australia, but ultimately determined the quantum of costs to be awarded.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
5
Commonwealth of Australia (as represented by the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development) v Shirvington (No.3)
[2015] FCCA 3234
Commonwealth of Australia v Hevers & Anor (No.2)
[2015] FCCA 2753
Scott (Trustee), in the matter of Price (Bankrupt)
[2011] FCA 1478