| [2017] FWCA 613 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Attorney General’s Department
(AG2016/7960)
ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Australian Capital Territory | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | CANBERRA, 31 JANUARY 2017 |
Application for approval of the Attorney-General’s Department Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Attorney-General’s Department Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Attorney General’s Department. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Subject to concerns that have been addressed by way of undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted undertakings from the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Attorney General’s Department. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings are attached to this decision.
[4] The Community and Public Sector Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 February 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 7 February 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE423194 PR589803>
Annexure 1
- AGLC
- Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Attorney General’s Department [2017] FWCA 613
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 613
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to decide included whether the agreement met the procedural requirements for registration under the Fair Work Act, and whether it complied with the provisions of the Act concerning unfair dismissal and redundancy. Furthermore, the court needed to assess if the agreement adequately addressed the need for employee representation and the protection of employees’ rights, particularly in relation to unfair dismissal and redundancy provisions. Another significant issue was whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and whether it adhered to the maximum hours of work and penalty rates.
The court, after reviewing the application and the submissions from all parties, concluded that the agreement substantially complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court found that the agreement was procedurally valid and met the necessary standards for registration. It also determined that the agreement appropriately addressed the issues of employee representation, unfair dismissal, and redundancy, and that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The court approved the application and registered the Attorney-General’s Department Enterprise Agreement 2016 as an enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.