Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Aussie Skips Bin Services Pty Ltd; Aussie Skips Recycling Pty Ltd; Roussakis
Case
•
[2024] FCA 122
•23 February 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Aussie Skips Bin Services Pty Ltd; Aussie Skips Recycling Pty Ltd; Roussakis [2024] FCA 122
[2024] FCA 122
23 February 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Aussie Skips Bin Services Pty Ltd; Aussie Skips Recycling Pty Ltd; Roussakis, the Court was presented with the task of sentencing two corporations and their chief executive officer for cartel conduct. The corporations, Aussie Skips Bin Services Pty Ltd and Aussie Skips Recycling Pty Ltd, were involved in providing collections and processing services for building and demolition waste in Sydney. Their chief executive, Mr Roussakis, pleaded guilty to aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring the companies to contravene cartel provisions. The legal issues before the Court included determining the objective seriousness of the cartel offences, applying appropriate discounts for mitigating factors, and considering the principles of deterrence and parity in sentencing.
The Court assessed the objective seriousness of the offences by examining the nature and circumstances, duration, and scale of the offending conduct. It found that the cartel conduct was deliberate, systematic, and covert, causing significant injury to the market and consumers. The Court also considered mitigating factors such as the pleas of guilty, cooperation with law enforcement, and the corporations' and Mr Roussakis's subjective circumstances. In terms of deterrence, the Court noted the need for both specific and general deterrence in cartel cases, while also considering the need for adequate punishment. The Court ensured parity with sentences imposed on co-offenders and balanced the totality principle with the need for appropriate punishment.
The Court imposed a fine of $1,750,000 on each of the corporations and a sentence of imprisonment for 18 months on Mr Roussakis, to be served by way of intensive correction in the community. Mr Roussakis was also fined $75,000. The Court further made a disqualification order under s 86E of the Competition and Consumer Act, disqualifying Mr Roussakis from managing corporations for a period of five years. The Court considered this disqualification order to be justified and appropriate, ensuring that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission was given notice of any application Mr Roussakis might make for leave to manage a corporation.
The Court assessed the objective seriousness of the offences by examining the nature and circumstances, duration, and scale of the offending conduct. It found that the cartel conduct was deliberate, systematic, and covert, causing significant injury to the market and consumers. The Court also considered mitigating factors such as the pleas of guilty, cooperation with law enforcement, and the corporations' and Mr Roussakis's subjective circumstances. In terms of deterrence, the Court noted the need for both specific and general deterrence in cartel cases, while also considering the need for adequate punishment. The Court ensured parity with sentences imposed on co-offenders and balanced the totality principle with the need for appropriate punishment.
The Court imposed a fine of $1,750,000 on each of the corporations and a sentence of imprisonment for 18 months on Mr Roussakis, to be served by way of intensive correction in the community. Mr Roussakis was also fined $75,000. The Court further made a disqualification order under s 86E of the Competition and Consumer Act, disqualifying Mr Roussakis from managing corporations for a period of five years. The Court considered this disqualification order to be justified and appropriate, ensuring that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission was given notice of any application Mr Roussakis might make for leave to manage a corporation.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Competition Law
Legal Concepts
-
Cartel Conduct
-
Sentencing
-
Plea of Guilty
-
Cooperation
-
Specific Performance
-
Disqualification Order
-
Deterrence
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Kirby [2025] FCA 757
Cases Citing This Decision
10
R v Kumar
[2024] NZHC 3955
Director of Public Prosecutions v LH Holding Management Pty Ltd; Director of Public Prosecutions v Hanna
[2025] VSCA 75
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Kirby
[2025] FCA 757
Cases Cited
72
Statutory Material Cited
4
R v Qutami
[2001] NSWCCA 353
Imbornone v R
[2017] NSWCCA 144