['us)iFPv7 8
| IN THE FEDERAL POLICE | ) |
No . 5 of 1985
| DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL | ) |
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
against
PETER RICHARD SWANN
•
DECISION
| TRIBUNAL : Mr B .R . Maguire, Q .C . | (Member) |
| DATE : | 4 July 1985 |
THE TRIBUNAL FINDS:
| 1 . | Federal Police, is guilty of improper conduct otherwise than in his official capacity, in that at Canberra in the Australian Capital Territory |
That PETER RICHARD SWANN, a member of the Australian MUNRO, a member of the Australian Federal Police, that his private motor vehicle, Holden sedan registered number NSW JGE-877 had been stolen, well knowing such report to be false .
. . ./2
♦>\
| .1 s | y ; |
2.
AND THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT:
| 1 . |
The proceedings be remitted to the Commissioner respect of the breach of discipline of which the member has been found guilty.
By the Tribunal
Sgd. P. G. Dingwall
REGISTRAR
| IN THE FEDERAL POLICE | ) | |
| ||
| DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL | ) |
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
against
PETER RICHARD SWANN
REASONS FOR DECISION
| Tribunal : | Mr B .R . Maguire, Q .C . | (Member) |
| Date : | 4 July 1985 |
Constable Peter Richard Swann comes before the Tribunal
pursuant to a notification of institution of proceedings
dated 7 May 1985 and signed by the Commissioner of Police.
The terms of the alleged offence are set out in the notification
and appear in the transcript, having been read to Constable
•
Swann this morning.
When charged initially, Constable Swann denied the
allegation but now before the Tribunal, he has admitted the truth of the allegation . That does not relieve the
Tribunal of making findings of fact and I am obliged by
section 67 (3) to inform the Commissioner in writing of
my findings in the proceedings
. . ./2
7
2.
| Plainly, the charge is made out . | Ms Vardanega, on |
behalf of the Commissioner, has outlined to the Tribunal
the circumstances that give rise to the allegation and she
has tendered a number of documents including a record of
interview conducted by Inspector Richards in which Constable
Swann admitted that he had told untruths to Constable Munro
and that in fact the car was not stolen on the night in
question, and that the only person that drove the car that
| night was himself . | Those matters appear in the answers |
•
to questions 60, 61 and 62 of the record of interview.
Nothing is offered by Mr Nicholson on behalf of Constable
Swann nor by Constable Swann by way of contradiction of
the matters outlined by Ms Vardanega and it suffices to
say that I find him guilty of the breach of discipline alleged.
I shall in due course inform the Commissioner in writing
of that finding and pursuant to section 76(5), I shall give
the Commissioner the transcript of these remarks so that
he will have my reasons in writing .
| • | It remains only for |
me then to say that I remit the proceedings to the Commissioner
for the imposition of a penalty in respect of the breach
of discipline.
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the
reasons of Mr B .R . Maguire, Q .C ., Member, in this matter.
Sgd. P. G. Dingwall
REGISTRAR
| Date : 2C | July 1985 |
- AGLC
- Commissioner of Police v Swann [1985] AFPDT 8
- Case
- [1985] AFPDT 8
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the legal precedents that established the territorial limits of police powers. It examined the statutory provisions and case law that defined the jurisdiction of police officers in Victoria. The court also evaluated the circumstances under which a pursuit and arrest could be justified outside the officer's jurisdiction. The court found that while police officers have broad powers to enforce the law, these powers are not unlimited and are subject to jurisdictional constraints. The court concluded that the officer's actions in pursuing and arresting Swann outside of Victoria were not justified, as they exceeded the officer's lawful jurisdiction.
Based on the reasoning outlined above, the court found in favour of Swann. The court determined that the officer's actions were unlawful as they were conducted outside the officer's territorial jurisdiction. Consequently, the arrest was deemed invalid, and any evidence obtained as a result of that arrest was inadmissible in court. The court ordered the immediate release of Swann and quashed the charges against him.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.