COMMISSIONER OF POLICE and ALBERT

The Commissioner of Police, acting in his capacity as the licensing authority, sought to suspend the security officer's licence of Mr Albert on the basis that he had committed disqualifying offences. The application was made pursuant to the relevant legislation, and Mr Albert sought to challenge the decision in the relevant court. The primary issue before the court was whether there were any extenuating circumstances that would prevent the suspension of Mr Albert's licence despite the disqualifying offences. The court considered the statutory framework governing the suspension of security officer's licences and the relevant provisions that permitted such suspensions.

The court noted that the legislation allowed for the suspension of a security officer's licence if they had committed disqualifying offences, unless there were extenuating circumstances that would prevent such a suspension. The court examined the evidence and information presented to determine whether there were any such extenuating circumstances in Mr Albert's case. After reviewing the evidence, the court found that there was no evidence or information that would support the conclusion that there were extenuating circumstances in this case. The court was satisfied that the Commissioner had followed the correct legal process and that the decision to suspend Mr Albert's licence was justified.

The court dismissed Mr Albert's application for review and affirmed the decision of the Commissioner to suspend his security officer's licence. The court found that the Commissioner had acted within his statutory powers and that there were no grounds for intervening in the decision. The court noted that the legislation did not require the Commissioner to consider any extenuating circumstances unless such circumstances were brought to his attention, and in this case, no such circumstances had been presented. The court's decision was final and binding, and Mr Albert's security officer's licence remained suspended.