| [2014] FWCA 5373 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
ComfortDelGro Cabcharge Pty Ltd
(AG2014/1775)
COMFORTDELGRO CABCHARGE PTY LTD ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE | SYDNEY, 7 AUGUST 2014 |
Application for approval of the ComfortDelGro Cabcharge Pty Ltd Engineering Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ComfortDelGro Cabcharge Pty Ltd Engineering Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by ComfortDelGro Cabcharge Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval have been met.
[4] The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s54 of the Act, will operate from 14 August 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE409504 PR554029>
- AGLC
- ComfortDelGro Cabcharge Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 5373
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 5373
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved assessing whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This included determining if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, whether it was free from coercion orundue influence, and if it promoted workplace harmony. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement provided for adequate protections for casual employees and if the classification of employees was fair and reasonable.
The Commission found that the agreement was free from coercion and undue influence and promoted workplace harmony. While acknowledging concerns from the unions about the casual employment provisions, the Commission concluded that the protections offered were fair and reasonable. It also found the classification of employees to be fair and reasonable, as the agreement provided for appropriate levels of skill and responsibility. Therefore, the Commission approved the agreement, finding it to be a simple, fair and reasonable agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Engineering Enterprise Agreement 2014. The Commission's decision is final and binding, and the agreement is now in effect.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.