Collier & Anor v Sengos
Case
•
[1994] HCATrans 423
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Collier & Anor v Sengos [1994] HCATrans 423
[1994] HCATrans 423
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants, Robert John Collier and Marion Louise Collier, sought special leave to appeal against a decision of the respondent, Paul Sheridan Sengos. The application was heard by Justices Dawson, Gaudron, and Brennan of the High Court of Australia.
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether to grant special leave to appeal. This involves a determination of whether the case raises a question of law of sufficient importance to warrant the High Court's attention.
The High Court, having considered submissions from both the applicants and the respondent regarding costs, refused the application for special leave to appeal. The court did not provide detailed reasons for its refusal, which is typical in special leave applications where the threshold for granting leave is high.
Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was refused, and the matter was adjourned sine die.
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether to grant special leave to appeal. This involves a determination of whether the case raises a question of law of sufficient importance to warrant the High Court's attention.
The High Court, having considered submissions from both the applicants and the respondent regarding costs, refused the application for special leave to appeal. The court did not provide detailed reasons for its refusal, which is typical in special leave applications where the threshold for granting leave is high.
Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was refused, and the matter was adjourned sine die.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0