| [2017] FWCA 6967 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Coles Group Supply Chain Pty Ltd
(AG2017/6080)
COLES SMEATON GRANGE (NUW) REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 21 DECEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the Coles Smeaton Grange (NUW) Regional Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] On 7 December 2017, Coles Group Supply Chain Pty Ltd(Applicant) made an application for approval of the Coles Smeaton Grange (NUW) Regional Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2017 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] The Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, has been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The National Union of Workers, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), the Commission notes that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[6] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s 54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 28 December 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is
31 August 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE426700 PR599030>
- AGLC
- Coles Group Supply Chain Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 6967
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 6967
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC determined that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, as it was negotiated in good faith and involved genuine consultation between the parties. The FWC also found that the agreement met the procedural requirements of the Act, including the appropriate bargaining period and the provision of relevant documents to the parties. The FWC further concluded that the agreement met the substantive requirements of the Act, including the provisions regarding minimum wages and conditions, and did not have any adverse effects on the broader industrial relations system. The FWC approved the agreement, finding it to be in the interests of the employees and the employer.
The FWC’s decision was based on the evidence presented by both parties, which demonstrated that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and that the parties had engaged in genuine consultation. The FWC also considered the provisions of the agreement and found that they were not contrary to the public interest or the broader industrial relations system. The FWC’s approval of the agreement was based on a careful consideration of the evidence and the legal requirements under the Act. The decision provides guidance to other employers and unions in relation to the negotiation and approval of enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.