Coleman Rail Pty Ltd t/a Evolve Bayswater

Case [2022] FWCA 90


[2022] FWCA 90

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Coleman Rail Pty Ltd t/a Evolve Bayswater

(AG2021/8956)

Evolve Bayswater and CFMEU (WA) and AWU (Bayswater Train Station) Greenfields Agreement 2021

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI

MELBOURNE, 28 JANUARY 2022

Application for approval of the Evolve Bayswater and CFMEU (WA) and AWU (Bayswater Train Station) Greenfields Agreement 2021.

  1. Application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Evolve Bayswater and CFMEU (WA) and AWU (Bayswater Train Station) Greenfields Agreement 2021 (Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act).

  1. By consent, the employer and employee organisations covered by the Agreement sought two amendments to the original application. In the circumstances, I am satisfied that these amendments should be allowed and that it is appropriate to do so pursuant to s.586 of the Act.

  1. A written undertaking was given in accordance with s.190 of the Act and is attached at Annexure A (Undertaking). The employee organisations covered by the Agreement supported the Undertaking. I am satisfied that the Undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee that would be covered by the Agreement and that the Undertaking will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3) of the Act, the Undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Noting clause 6.1(b) of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards in the Act (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. On the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that this is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) and the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it.

  1. In accordance with s.187(5)(b) of the Act, I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

  1. Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act, I note the Agreement was made with CFMMU and AWU and that the Agreement covers these organisations.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 28 January 2022 and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 4 February 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 January 2026.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE514593  PR737447>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Coleman Rail Pty Ltd t/a Evolve Bayswater [2022] FWCA 90
Case
[2022] FWCA 90
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Coleman Rail Pty Ltd, trading as Evolve Bayswater, sought approval from the Fair Work Commission for a greenfield agreement with the CFMEU (WA) and AWU (Bayswater Train Station). The proposed agreement aimed to establish a new workplace with terms and conditions for employees working on the Bayswater Train Station project. The parties engaged in negotiations, and the agreement was submitted for approval by the Commission. The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it met the requirements for a greenfield agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to consider if the agreement was genuinely negotiated, if it contained the minimum terms and conditions required by law, and if it was in the best interests of the employees.

The Commission examined the evidence and submissions from both parties to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated. It found that the parties had engaged in good faith negotiations and that the agreement reflected the outcome of those negotiations. The Commission also assessed if the agreement contained the minimum terms and conditions required by law, including the national minimum wage and standard working hours. The Commission concluded that the agreement met these requirements. Finally, the Commission considered if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, taking into account the overall benefits and detriments of the proposed terms and conditions. The Commission determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided a fair and reasonable set of terms and conditions for the new workplace.

The Fair Work Commission approved the agreement, finding that it was genuinely negotiated, contained the minimum terms and conditions required by law, and was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission's decision was based on the evidence and submissions provided by both parties, and it recognised the need to establish a new workplace with fair and reasonable terms and conditions for employees working on the Bayswater Train Station project. The approval of the agreement allows the parties to proceed with the implementation of the proposed terms and conditions for the new workplace.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.