Colbert and Colbert
Case
•
[2008] FamCA 461
•23 June 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Colbert and Colbert [2008] FamCA 461
[2008] FamCA 461
23 June 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Colbert and Colbert*, heard by Moore J, the dispute concerned the division of property between a husband and wife. The court was required to make orders regarding the distribution of assets and the financial settlement between the parties.
The central legal issues before the court were the appropriate orders to be made for the transfer of property and the payment of a sum of money, as well as the consequences of non-compliance with these orders. The court also considered the entitlement of each party to retain other property not specifically mentioned in the orders.
Moore J made orders for the husband to transfer his interest in a South African property to the wife absolutely. The husband was also ordered to pay the wife a sum of $233,000 within one month. In the event of non-payment, the husband was to sell another property, known as M, for the best obtainable price and pay the $233,000 to the wife upon settlement. The orders stipulated that, apart from the specified property, each party was entitled to retain all other property they owned at the date of the orders. Furthermore, the court appointed a Registrar or Deputy Registrar to execute any necessary documents if either party failed to do so, pursuant to section 106A of the *Family Law Act*.
The central legal issues before the court were the appropriate orders to be made for the transfer of property and the payment of a sum of money, as well as the consequences of non-compliance with these orders. The court also considered the entitlement of each party to retain other property not specifically mentioned in the orders.
Moore J made orders for the husband to transfer his interest in a South African property to the wife absolutely. The husband was also ordered to pay the wife a sum of $233,000 within one month. In the event of non-payment, the husband was to sell another property, known as M, for the best obtainable price and pay the $233,000 to the wife upon settlement. The orders stipulated that, apart from the specified property, each party was entitled to retain all other property they owned at the date of the orders. Furthermore, the court appointed a Registrar or Deputy Registrar to execute any necessary documents if either party failed to do so, pursuant to section 106A of the *Family Law Act*.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Remedies
-
Injunction
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Colbert and Colbert [2008] FamCA 461
Cases Citing This Decision
0