Cockman v Gorman
Case
•
[2022] WASC 125
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Cockman v Gorman [2022] WASC 125
[2022] WASC 125
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Western Australia, Tristan Cockman, a former member of the Western Australian Branch of the Australian Labor Party (ALP), has sued the defendants, who were members of the State Executive and Administrative Committee of the WA Labor Party, for what he contends is a breach of the 2015 Constitution and Rules governing preselection. The defendants have applied for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to strike out paragraphs of the statement of claim. In granting the defendants' application, Curthoys J held that the preselection process of the political party is not justiciable, and that the rules of the political party do not create enforceable contractual rights and duties. The court accepted that the rules of the WA Labor Party do not evidence an intention to create legal relations, and that there was no relevant 'legal norm'. The defendants' application for summary judgment was accordingly granted, and judgment was entered for the defendants.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Unjust Enrichment
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Cockman v Gorman [2022] WASC 125
Most Recent Citation
Cockman v Gorman [2023] WASCA 44
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Richards v High Energy Service Pty Ltd
[2023] WADC 52
Pisano v South Metropolitan Health Service
[2023] WASCA 80
Cases Cited
19
Statutory Material Cited
0
Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Ltd
[1983] HCA 25
Agar v Hyde
[2000] HCA 41