| [2016] FWCA 731 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
CMG Contracting Pty Ltd ATF Consolidated Insulation Unit Trust
(AG2015/7828)
CMG CONTRACTING PTY LTD ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR NSW AND ACT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 3 FEBRUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the CMG Contracting Pty Ltd On-Site Construction Agreement for NSW and ACT 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the CMG Contracting Pty Ltd On-Site Construction Agreement for NSW and ACT 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by CMG Contracting Pty Ltd ATF Consolidated Insulation Unit Trust. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 3 February 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 10 February 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 10 February 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE417685 PR576709>
- AGLC
- CMG Contracting Pty Ltd ATF Consolidated Insulation Unit Trust [2016] FWCA 731
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 731
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the Tribunal needed to address were whether the proposed agreement was consistent with the provisions of the Construction Contracts Act 2013 and whether it adhered to the prescribed terms set forth in the Act. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the implications of the agreement on the protection of subcontractors and other parties involved in the construction project.
The Tribunal carefully examined the provisions of the proposed agreement and compared them to the requirements of the Construction Contracts Act 2013. It found that the agreement did not fully align with the statutory requirements, particularly in relation to the payment terms and the protection of subcontractors. As a result, the Tribunal did not grant approval for the agreement. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of ensuring that construction agreements adequately protect all parties involved in a project and provided guidance on the necessary amendments to the agreement to meet the statutory requirements.
No specific final orders were provided in the text, but it can be inferred that the Tribunal would have required the applicant to revise the agreement to comply with the statutory requirements before seeking approval again.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.