| [2017] FWCA 5610 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
CM Group Pty Ltd
(AG2017/2861)
CM GROUP PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017-2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 27 OCTOBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the CM Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the CM Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by C M Group Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 27 October 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 3 November 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 27 October 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE425899 PR597198>
- AGLC
- CM Group Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 5610
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5610
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved the interpretation and application of the better off overall test, which requires that the proposed agreement must be more favourable to the employees than the applicable award or safety net terms. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the agreement contained mandatory provisions and whether it complied with the procedural requirements under the Fair Work Act.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement did not meet the better off overall test as it did not provide sufficient evidence that the employees would be better off overall under the agreement compared to their current conditions. The Commission also noted procedural issues with the way the agreement was formulated, including a lack of adequate consultation with the employees. Consequently, the Commission rejected the application for approval.
No orders were made as the application was dismissed. The Commission provided detailed reasons for its decision, highlighting the deficiencies in the application and the need for more comprehensive evidence to support the proposed terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.