| [2015] FWCA 4068 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Club Forster
(AG2015/1297)
CLUB FORSTER AND SPORTIES TUNCURRY EMPLOYEE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015-2019
Licensed and registered clubs | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS | SYDNEY, 18 JUNE 2015 |
Application for approval of the Club Forster and Sporties Tuncurry Employees Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019.
[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Club Forster (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Club Forster and Sporties Tuncurry Employee Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement is to cover 141 Forster Tuncurry Memorial Services Club employees, other than Club Managers. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.
[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 16 April 2015 and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place between 4 and 18 May 2015. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a vote for the Agreement’s approval, 23 of the 35 employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 1 June 2015, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.
[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr P Clarke, General Manager, identified the Registered and Licensed Clubs Award 2010 [MA000058] and the Clubs Employees (State) Award 2006 [AN120136] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Clarkesaid that the Agreement does provide for some terms and conditions that are less beneficial than those under the reference instruments, including the removal of split shift allowances, a lack of late and early work penalties and provision for annual leave loading to be paid only where an employee takes a period of one week or more of annual leave at a time. However, the Agreement provides for a range of terms and conditions that are in excess of, or more beneficial than those under the reference instruments, including higher rates of pay, paid ten minute tea breaks for every shift of six hours or more, enhanced overtime entitlements for casual employees, more generous severance entitlements and a minimum engagement on public holidays of six hours for full time employees and three hours for casual employees. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. It was also said that the ability to cash out personal and annual leave constituted another benefit for the employees. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 19 and 42 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 39 provides for independent mediation and conciliation and the issuing of binding recommendations by the Commission.
[4] At a hearing of the application on 16 June 2015, Mr M Ushakoff of ClubsNSW,appeared with Mr P Clarke for the applicant. Mr Ushakoff comprehensively outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. He explained that the rates of pay are 3.6-8.7% higher than those under the reference instruments and are to be adjusted in accordance with the Commission’s Minimum Wage Review decisions.
[5] Having heard the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Club Forster and Sporties Tuncurry Employee Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 23 June 2015 and have a nominal expiry date of 22 June 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE414361 PR568426>
- AGLC
- Club Forster [2015] FWCA 4068
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4068
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the commission involved the adequacy of the proposed agreement in ensuring the employees' remuneration and conditions met the Fair Work Act's minimum standards. The commission had to determine if the pay rates, including allowances and loadings, were sufficient to cover the employees' basic needs and if the agreement contained any provisions that could potentially undermine the employees' rights or be detrimental to their welfare.
The commission reviewed the submissions and evidence provided by both parties. It found that the proposed agreement did not adequately provide for the minimum rates of pay as required by the Fair Work Act. The commission was concerned that the proposed rates did not account for the employees' basic living expenses, particularly in light of the cost of living in the region. The commission also noted that some provisions in the agreement could potentially lead to confusion or misinterpretation regarding the employees' entitlements, which could be detrimental to their rights. Based on these findings, the commission decided that the application for approval of the enterprise agreement should be rejected.
The commission ordered that the application for approval of the Club Forster and Sporties Tuncurry Employees Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019 be rejected. It directed the parties to negotiate in good faith to address the identified issues and to submit a revised agreement that meets the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The commission emphasized the importance of ensuring that the employees' remuneration and conditions are fair and adequate, and that the agreement does not undermine their rights or welfare.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.